Friday, October 28, 2016

Branagh v Billy-Bob


 

Last night Steve and I piled into the little local Windmill Theatre yet again for one of the latest fashion for film/theatre goers that I find to be a generous gift to me in my own tiny quirky world. This newish idea of showing a show directly form the West End or a Grande Opera House somewhere in the world and allowing ordinary beings who could not afford an outing to a top ranking performance such as these in their wildest dreams. Theatre prices need saving up for these days and here at last is a way of bringing the worlds greatest performers to small town arts buffs for a fraction of the prices ‘Up West’. The cost of our seats for this production of The Entertainer by John Osborne starring Kenneth Branagh was £14 each which is a fraction of the price the people who were actually in the Garrick Theatre last night had paid; for us the Windmill price of entry had doubled on the day to day cost of a movie visit. Seemed like a win to me.
 

Looking around the audience before the show started I saw that it was almost the same audience as the other ‘Direct From’ treats that we had been to see in our small seaside town of late. So in fact I am incorrect saying that this is top theatre at bargain price for the masses, the ordinary people. They don’t want to see this wonder; they would rather pay double the cinema price to see some trash action movie/horror/sci-fi in the Imax cinema. Yet it is a way for the cinema to make a little out of this new fashion and that is fair enough by my book. These are diamonds for glass prices.
 
 

Steve hated it from the first moment but he doesn’t like Branagh anyway. For myself, I realised too late to pop out to the car park, that I had left my distance glasses in the car which left me squinting at the screen for the hour and sixteen minutes of the first act that left me feeling slightly sickly. I thought Kenneth Branagh was brilliant as Archie Rice but found the play itself seeming not so much retro and dated and not yet classic, as sort of in the wrong time frame of reproduction rather than antique. I can see that I run the risk or finding myself in the same position as the small child who saw that the King did not have wonderful new clothes but that he was in truth completely starkers! Nobody can make me say I liked it because they think one should only heap praise great writers and actors and all their works. It brought me no pleasure and certainly not satisfaction at seeing their greatness. 

I do find it fascinating the professionals like Kenneth Branagh can cope with the learning of new specialist skills for part such as this and I was more then a little distracted with his nicely stylised dancing, that was soft and pretty with lovely head, body and arm lines that cannot have been easy to get to grips with for a man who does not have Fred Astaire’s frame. Good job Ken!
 
 
Today I found myself cruelly comparing Kenneth Branagh and this production to the TV series of Goliath that we have been watching on Amazon Prime of late and fearless of criticism of my intellectual state and equally fearless of making this strange comparison, must admit that the performance that gave the greatest pleasure was Billy Bob Thornton’s by a country mile. Playing a drunken, washed up lawyer living in a motel room next door to the closest bar who gets to grips with a really nasty case and against all odds blah, blah, blah. The story of a very rich company getting away with evil doings is heavy going. Billy Bob Thornton playing the down and not quite out, legal eagle Billy McBride is utterly astonishing; gosh he looks awful in this part and at least ten years older than he actually is though, I must add, still strangely appealing. William Hurt also gets my admiration as the head of the rich law firm who also looks awful and actually plays a really truly unbelievably awful power crazy person.
 

 
 

 

No comments: